Sierra Leone
Limitations on the Sierra Leone Special Court criticized

Related items

News articles
» 03.01.2002 - War Crimes Court for Sierra Leone approved 
» 13.01.2000 - Prosecuting child soldiers for war crimes; Good or bad idea?
» 29.12.2000 - 'Sierra Leone war crimes court should target top leaders only'
» 01.12.2000 - Rights group documents new atrocities in Sierra Leone 
» 01.11.2000 - Limitations on the Sierra Leone Special Court criticized 
» 06.10.2000 - Sierra Leone Court: 'There is no amnesty for international crimes' 
» 27.09.2000 - Bringing torturers and dictators to justice 
» 19.09.2000 - Ghana demands an International Criminal Court for Africa 
» 15.08.2000 - UN action on Sierra Leone court welcomed 
» 14.08.2000 - UN wishes to try Sierra Leone war criminals 
»  26.07.2000 - Security council debates issue of children in war 
» 05.06.2000 - RUF fighters rape women and children in Makeni 
» 31.05.2000 - RUF abducts children for fighting, labour and sexual exploitation 
» 26.05.2000 - New RUF terror tactics 

Pages
Sierra Leone Home Page 
Sierra Leone News 
Sierra Leone Index Page 
Map of Sierra Leone 
News 

Background
» Sierra Leone one year after the peace accord 
» The Civil War in Sierra Leone 

Documents 
» UN report on the Sierra Leone Tribunal 

In Internet
Human Rights Watch  
IRIN - Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone Web

afrol.com, 1 November - The United Nations Security Council may be preparing to place excessive limitations on the Sierra Leone Special Court, Human Rights Watch charged today. The proposed restrictions might limit the Court's jurisdiction to crimes committed since November 30, 1996.

This limitation would be leaving untried the crimes committed since the beginning of the war in March 1991. This raises the possibility that some of the worst perpetrators of atrocities in Sierra Leone, such as former rebel leader Foday Sankoh, would walk free.

- If the Sierra Leone Special Court is not given jurisdication over crimes commited during the entire war, justice cannot be served for the people of Sierra Leone, said Peter Takirambudde, director of the Africa division of Human Rights Watch (HRW). "The bottom line is that perpetrators of atrocities committed bewteen 1991 and 1996 will never be tried." 

Human Rights Watch welcomed UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's report on the Special Court, but urged the Security Council to approve a statute that will empower the court to act more effectively. This Court must create a precedent for a strong cooperation between national and international justice, HRW claims. 

- The Court must be vested with powers to vigorously enforce international cooperation at every stage, and member States should cooperate with the Court's orders and requests, the human rights NGO says in a statement. 

Human Rights Watch also recommends that the Special Court not try persons who were under the age of eighteen when they committed crimes. Children should be held accountable for their offenses, but in view of their inherent immaturity, and because many child combatants were forcibly abducted, brutalized and coerced, Human Rights Watch believes that the Court's already limited resources should be used to pursue adults, not children. 

In addition, Human Rights Watch opposes the statute's definition of the crime of recruitment of child soldiers. The statute considerably narrows the well-established prohibition of recruitment or use of children. The statute's definition should be amended to include any recruitment or use of children under the age of fifteen in hostilities as a war crime. 


Source: Human Rights Watch


© afrol.com. Texts and graphics may be reproduced freely, under the condition that their origin is clearly referred to, see Conditions.

   You can contact us at mail@afrol.com