afrol News, 24 August - A South African study has found no evidence that better nutrition can substitute anti-retroviral treatment (ARV). This comes at a time when South Africans have been debating whether nutrition can be an alternative to ARVs.

South African Health Minister, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, firmly believed that eating garlic, beetroot and olive oil could be a substitute to ARV. Her statement was widely condemned, but it also created confusion among millions of South Africans living with HIV/AIDS. She was later named "Ms Beetroot."

The report was the result of a two-year review of 2,000 studies on the role of nutrition in HIV and pandemics by a 15 member panel of scientists at the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf).

During the period, the panel perused through so many nutritional guidelines, including those from the World Health Organisation, the South African Department of Health and the South African HIV/AIDS Clinicians Society.

The scientists found no evidence that better nutrition alone can curb or treat HIV or TB.

"Neither poverty nor malnutrition is the cause of HIV/AIDS or tuberculosis," a panel member, Professor Este Vorster, Director of the Africa Unit for Trans-disciplinary Health Research at Northwest University, said.

"If you have been tested for HIV and you know your status, you need to know that dietary supplements cannot compensate for healthy eating,“ Professor Vorster said, adding “eating healthily cannot compensate for anti-retroviral drugs.”

The report also discovered that HIV-positive people, family members, caregivers and the community have been confused about the validity of medicines and nutrition and the roles they play.

A distrust medical doctors and their prescription treatments has also been discovered. This is mainly due to the dual regulatory practices arising from the contrast between western scientific tradition and traditional medicine and the politics related to culture in South Africa.

"In traditional medicine, we have a different approach: it is seen as wisdom passed on. It's simply, in a sense, experience in practice," Wieland Gevers, ASSAf’s Executive Officer, said.

"Traditional medical practitioners say that part of the remedy is the patient's belief in the remedy itself, and it's very hard to test that in a controlled study."

"Also, there are the special conditions of the historical transitions," Gevers said. "Nobody wants to be very heavy handed with the traditions of the majority - about 80 percent of South Africans would go to a traditional healer first; it's very hard to regulate a tradition that the majority of the population thinks is okay.”

The report recommends the need for better regulation of traditional or alternative medicines as well as education the population about their uses.

The report has been published when South African government is being criticised for firing the Deputy Health Minister, Nozize Madlala-Routledge. Ms Madlala-Routledge has criticised the way her country’s policy on HIV/AIDS treatment.

But Gevers said the study has no political connotation.

Ms Tshabalala-Msimang’s office is yet to react to the report, although an advanced copy has been sent to her.

By staff writer

© afrol News

Related pages and feature

Current afrol News Top Stories